Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I
>>>> might have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around:
>>>>
>>>> Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define
>>>> HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless?
>>>>
>>> With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW
>>> handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix.
>>>
>>> Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.
>>>
>>
>> Which is what? :-)
>>
>> It just needs to set HAVE_FSEEKO to 1 in pg_config.h?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Yep. I have fixed it already.
Ok, thanks!
//Magnus
