Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Date
Msg-id 4964AB7D.5030905@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> "is a natural consequence of the fact" --- There is nothing natural
>> about any of this.  Why is it a consequence and how?
>  
> How could you possibly get any of those phenomena if there are no
> concurrent transactions?

I see what you mean now, but you could write out that logic in more detail.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: error code 25001
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.