Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?
Date
Msg-id 495674AA.8050706@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?  ("Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?
List pgsql-hackers
Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2008/12/28 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
>>> 2008/12/27 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>>>> which doesn't conform to spec AFAICS ...
>>> ....4.15...says:
>> interesting...6.10 general rule 1b, which very clearly states ...
>> ... 4.15 does seem like evidence that the spec authors may
>> have misspoke in 6.10
> Oracle... results are: ... which means the section 4.15 is true

ISTM ISO should hire you guys (or the postgres project as a whole)
to proof-read their specs before they publish them.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hitoshi Harada"
Date:
Subject: Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?
Next
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: new libpq SSL connection option