Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Date
Msg-id 4943.1263142410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> I was checked where the string converted with "%ld" is used.
>> An especially fatal part is not found excluding one of plperl.

> I have not looked at the plperl stuff yet. I'd appreciate a comment
> from someone who knows plperl :-) Andrew, maybe?

I think I dealt with that already, if Tsutomu-san is speaking of the
prepared-query hash table keys in plperl and pltcl.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG patch causes warning
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status