Hi,
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> c) Postgres-R for multi-master data replication, appears to be a code
>> fork of PostgreSQL
>
> Not stable as far as I know.
Correct, it's not meant to be stable at this stage of development.
I'm a bit disturbed by the tag "code fork", which has a rather negative
connotation. At the same time you compare with MySQL, featuring built-in
replication.
Let me simply point out and clarify, that I have absolutely no intent to
fork from Postgres. Quite the opposite, I'm interested in working
together with other Postgres hackers.
See also FAQ 2.2:
http://www.postgres-r.org/about/faqs
Regards
Markus Wanner
