Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escribió:
>
>> Yeah, we need two "at-commit" routines, one of which needs to be called
>> early. I'm prepping a patch.
>
> Here it is ... the large object patch is also included. I've created
> new functions to specify the resource owner to register a snapshot in;
> now that there are two callers, it seems likely that there will be more
> in the future.
I'm surprised you implemented RegisterSnapshotOnOwner by switching
CurrentResourceOwner and calling RegisterSnapshot, rather than
implementing RegisterSnapshot by calling RegisterSnapshotOnOwner(...,
CurrentResourceOwner).
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
