Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id 4936.1288037360@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>)
Responses Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
List pgsql-hackers
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> writes:
> That said, the possiblity of hex i/o format for the float datatypes
> would be welcome.

It's unportable, for two different reasons:

1. pg_dump output would become platform-specific.  This is highly
undesirable.

2. The printf specifiers you want us to rely on are not standard.
Cf Single Unix Spec,
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/fprintf.html
which does not define either %A or %a.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: add label to enum syntax
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships