maintenance memory vs autovac - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject maintenance memory vs autovac
Date
Msg-id 49353A69.20001@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: maintenance memory vs autovac  (Greg Stark <greg.stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Would it make sense to be able to configure maintenance_work_mem
specifically for the autovacuum processes? Given that there can be a
number of them, it might be good to be able to have one default for all
*other* processes, and a separate one from the ones kicked off by autovac?

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: pg_stat_all_tables vs NULLs
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] lo_open() makes a warning/falls to an assertion