Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date
Msg-id 4934EF9E.7040600@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> After thinking about it I'm inclined to feel that SS and friends should
> insist on exactly 2 digits.  If you want to allow 1-or-2-digits then use
> FMSS, just like the error message tells you.  (However, I have a vague
> feeling that Oracle doesn't insist on this, and in the end we ought to
> follow Oracle's behavior.  Can anyone check?)

Oracle doesn't insist on it.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202