I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?
I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.