Tom Lane wrote:
> Siddharth Shah <siddharth.shah@elitecore.com> writes:
>
>> In My Application I have only 256MB storage device and I have to
>> manage many other application in same storage
>>
>
> Quite honestly, you're going to need some other database besides
> Postgres if you need a disk footprint that's only a fraction of 256MB.
> It's just not designed for that. Maybe sqllite or bdb would be closer
> to what you need.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
Hi Tom,
I have explored SQLite & DBD but they have limitations on concurrency
My Requirement falls In between lighter & enterprise databases
So finally concluded postgres, My database size on pg is almost 12 MB
Does any cons which I am going to face with pg with slower size then
please mention.
Transaction frequencies : more select queries than insert / update
Almost 20 queries/sec is executing with current database.
- Siddharth
