Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> * This seems to be still mostly NetBSD code, so I think you need to do
>>> more than just credit them in an aside. Should we repeat the full
>>> NetBSD copyright notice for this one function?
>
>> Do you mean the
>> * Copyright (c) 1989, 1993, 1994
>> * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
>> *
>> * This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by
>> * Guido van Rossum.
>
>> part, or the whole licence? Since the licence is the same as ours, doing
>> that seems like overkill.
>
> Well, it does say
>
> * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
Right, maybe we'd better do that even if it's identical to our own.
Better credit too much than not enough. I'll put the whole thing in -
will move the function to the bottom of the file as well to clearly
isolate which parts it's referring to.
//Magnus
