Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the reason we've avoided putting such stuff into include/port/
>> is that right now that directory consists exclusively of OS-specific
>> files. Maybe we need another include subdirectory?
>
> I think the idea is rather that you don't need to change call sites to
> include the system header or our own. The symlink approach I mentioned
> earlier might work.
Anything that needs symlinks will need a set of workarounds on Windows,
having us manually do a copy of the files. We already do this in a
couple of cases, but relying more on it would make things even more
kludgy I think...
//Magnus
