Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?
Date
Msg-id 49270F2C.90403@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Last I checked, Magnus had promised to come up with suitable
>>> documentation changes for this patch, but then he went off sailing...
> 
>> Meh, I seem to have forgotten this one again. Here's a suggestion, seems
>> ok, or were you thinking about something more?
> 
> Needs a bit of proofreading but this is more or less what I had in
> mind.
> 
>> +    Enum settings are specified the same way as string settings, but they
>> +    are limited in which strings are accepted. For each setting the available
>> +    are listed in <literal>pg_settings.enumvals</>.
> 
> IIRC the comparisons are case-insensitive; if so the fact should be
> mentioned here.

Updated, added, and applied.

//Magnus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autoconf, libpq and replacement function
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value.