Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date
Msg-id 4926F465.1030307@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time  (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>> volume count doesn't capture.
>
> I am still relatively new to Postgres, but my impression is that the questions
> have gotten harder/more in depth. Fewer, How do you pronounce Postgres? and
> more, Explain the various isolation levels for transactions and how does that
> affect my particular situation?

This is definitely the case. Whether it's because the documentation is
better, or we're getting a more sophisticated user the questions are
certainly more involved.

Some of the EXPLAINs on the performance list are practically impossible
to read unless you've got the time to cut+paste and fix line-endings.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared statement already exists
Next
From: "Ciprian Dorin Craciun"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings