Tom Lane wrote:
> petere@postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> TABLE command
>
> If this got re-posted for review I missed it :-(. I disagree with using
> qualified_name here --- I think it would be better to use relation_expr
> so that people would have the ability to specify inheritance behavior.
> If you want to point to the spec and say that that syntax isn't in the
> spec, that's true, but then you need to justify the inhOpt setting
> you're forcing people to use. It's not entirely clear what behavior the
> spec intends, but I'm pretty sure INH_DEFAULT isn't it.
relation_expr is fine by me. It just makes the syntax more complicated
to explain ...
Btw., so we plan to keep the sql_inheritance parameter forever?
