Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast
Date
Msg-id 49252DE0.6070204@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> The question is if we should do toast modification now to avoid 
> potential future problems or if we will solve it when any on-disk format 
> change requires it?

Perhaps we should just add the new attid attribute to the toast table, 
but mark it as nullable? We wouldn't need to fill it in in the 8.3->8.4 
conversion but new tuples would include it.

In the future release that we actually need it, we'll make it 
non-nullable, and write a pre-upgrade script to retoast tuples that 
don't have it yet.

Hmm. That would change TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE, though.

> I prefer do it now, because there could be small risk that it will not 
> possible to do it in the future. When in-place upgrade will be 
> implemented nobody will want to perform backup/restore.

I feel we should avoid doing anything extra, risking that we get nothing 
finished.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: HEAD build failure on win32 mingw