Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes:
>>> On the whole I vote for #4 out of these.
>
>> I attached a patch for the docs. Its documented as a NOTE to the
>> PGEventProc.
>
> Applied, but I editorialized on the wording a bit. Let me know if you
> think this is wrong ...
>
>
It's correct, the wording is clearer now. I wasn't aware there was a caution
tag, which is better than using <note>.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
