Re: RAM-only temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: RAM-only temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 4912C92D.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RAM-only temporary tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RAM-only temporary tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: 
> I think a large fraction of the writes you're measuring are coming
from
> the file create/unlink operations.  It would certainly be important
to
> identify where the bulk of the cost *really* is before we start
> expending effort on a solution.
Any ideas on a good way to gather that information?
Given the temp_buffers space, would it make sense to defer the
creation of the actual file until there is actually a need to spill
data to the disk?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for ISO-8601-Interval Input and output.
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EnableDisableTrigger Cleanup & Questions