Gregory Stark wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
>
> Wouldn't it be just as good to indicate to the archive command the amount of
> real data in the wal file and have it only bother copying up to that point?
That sounds like a great solution to me; ideally it would be done in a
way that is always on (i.e. no setting, etc.).
On the log-recovery side, PG would need to be willing to accept
shorter-than-usual segments, if it's not already willing.
--
Kyle Cordes
http://kylecordes.com
