Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Date
Msg-id 490779BE.90401@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Responses Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
List pgsql-hackers
Kris Jurka napsal(a):
> 
> 
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Kris Jurka wrote:
> 
>> The problem with trying to deprecate it is that the vast majority of 
>> the backend is still using the old interfaces, so people looking for 
>> inspiration for their external modules will likely end up using the 
>> old interface.  Like Alvaro I started this conversion a while ago, got 
>> bored, and forgot about it. If people do want this conversion done 
>> while keeping the old interface around, I can track down that patch, 
>> update it and finish it up for the next CommitFest.
>>
> 
> Here's a patch that changes everything over to the the new API and 
> implements the old API by calling the new API.

It seems to me OK. I have only one comment. I prefer to pfree allocated memory 
for temporary nulls array. I think that caller could call old API many times 
without memory context cleanup.

    Zdenek



-- 
Zdenek Kotala              Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic     http://sun.com/postgresql



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby.
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28