Re: minimal update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: minimal update
Date
Msg-id 48FDE31D.5040200@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minimal update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: minimal update
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>   
>> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it  
>> easily?
>>     
>
> One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when
> to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the
> documentation.  There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger"
> would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document
> itself pretty much however it wants.
>   

I was thinking a new section on 'trigger functions' of the functions and 
operators chapter, linked from the 'create trigger' page. That doesn't 
seem like too much of a wart.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: corrupted pg_proc?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby utility and administrator functions