Re: minimal update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: minimal update
Date
Msg-id 48FC4133.7020708@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minimal update  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: minimal update
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>  
>>> OK. Where would be a good place to put the code? Maybe a new file
>>> src/backend/utils/adt/trigger_utils.c ?
>>>     
>>
>> I thought the plan was to make it a contrib module.
>>
>>            
>>   
> 
> Well, previous discussion did mention catalog entries, which would
> suggest otherwise, but I can do it as a contrib module if that's the
> consensus.

What would be the actual reason to put it in contrib and not core? Are
there any "dangers" by having it there? Or is it "just a hack" and not a
"real solution"?

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: SQL:2008 LIMIT/OFFSET