Hi,
Josh Berkus wrote:
> So it sounds like intagg is still in use/development. But ... is it
> more of an example, or is it useful as a type/function in production?
We use it in production for quite remarkable speedups of operations on
int4[].
Having reviewed the last commit fest's intagg patch as well, I thought
we agreed that a more general functionality is wanted for core. But as
long as we don't have that, I'd like intagg to stay in contrib.
Regards
Markus Wanner
