Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences
Date
Msg-id 48EF8B9C.2050801@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences  (Bart Grantham <bg@logicworks.net>)
List pgsql-general
Bart Grantham wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been beaten into the ground, but my team and I
> couldn’t find much conclusive study or posts on this issue.  To make a
> long story short: we’re experiencing Xeons as 50% slower than Opterons,
> even when the Xeon has twice as much cache and a slight clock speed
> advantage.

Simple question, you know that the plans are the same?  And I don't
think you said conclusively that it's the same version of PGSQL on both
servers?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: grabbing date of last Sunday?
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences