Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning
Date
Msg-id 48E48F5F.6050703@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning  (Tommy Gildseth <tommy.gildseth@usit.uio.no>)
List pgsql-performance
Tommy Gildseth wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> paul@wayr.org wrote:
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Unfornatly, i can't update pgsql to 8.3 since it's not in debian stable.
>>
>> That's why backports.org was invented :-)
>> Or does can't mean "not allowed to"?
>
> Well, running production servers from backports can be a risky
> proposition too, and can land you in situations like the one discussed
> in "Debian packages for Postgres 8.2" from the General list.

Well, there's a reason why "stable" is a popular choice for production
servers. I must admit that I build from source for my PostgreSQL
packages (because I care which version I run). I was reading one of the
Perl fellows recommending the same.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tommy Gildseth
Date:
Subject: Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning
Next
From: "Віталій Тимчишин"
Date:
Subject: Delete performance again