Re: Bad link for win32/latest - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Date
Msg-id 48D9D41A.60903@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad link for win32/latest  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: Bad link for win32/latest  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-www
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to
>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3.
>>
> 
> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4 
> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/

I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out
soon :-)

I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did wesay "keep current and one older"? In that case,
thereis some removing
 
to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have
source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not
very consistent :-(

If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-)

//Magnus



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad link for win32/latest