On 2008-09-12 15:52, Jack Orenstein wrote:
> Sorry, I misspoke. I have an index, but preferred doing a scan without
> the index in this case.
Why?
The only reason I can think of is that you'd like to avoid disk seeking.
But you get at most 1 row in 30 seconds, so disk latency (only several
milliseconds) can be ignored.
Regards
Tometzky
--
...although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a
moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you
were...
Winnie the Pooh
