Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2008/9/1 David West <david.west@cusppoint.com>:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestion but the result is the same.
>>
>> Here is the explain analyse output from different queries.
>> Select * from my_table where A is null and B = '21' limit 15
>>
>> "Limit (cost=0.00..3.68 rows=15 width=128) (actual time=85837.043..85896.140 rows=15 loops=1)"
>> " -> Seq Scan on my_table this_ (cost=0.00..258789.88 rows=1055580 width=128) (actual time=85837.038..85896.091
rows=15loops=1)"
>> " Filter: ((A IS NULL) AND ((B)::text = '21'::text))"
>> "Total runtime: 85896.214 ms"
>>
>>
[snip]
Further to Pavel's comments;
(actual time=85837.038..85896.091 rows=15 loops=1)
That's 85 seconds on a sequence scan to return the first tuple. The table is not bloated by any chance is it?
Regards
Russell
