Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Daniele Depetrini wrote:
>> Hi Again,
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> There is no auto-idle-close mechanism in the pool implementation
> provided by the driver.
>
> The connection pool shipped with the driver is very basic. If it
> doesn't do what you need it to, you probably want to use a 3rd party
> connection pool (e.g. dbcp). I don't think there's much point in
> building any sort of fully-featured connection pool to ship with the
> driver - there are plenty of other implementations already out there.
>
> -O
>
>
Thanks for the answer. Actually according to my testing up to now is
working "well enough". It's not clear to me if prepared statements
pooling is implemented: in positive case will be much better to use
internal pooling instead of an external one, what do you think?
Daniele.
