Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Subject Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 48AA9B62.2060107@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I seem to recall that there was general support for installing a smaller 
> default postgresql.conf file with only, say, a dozen parameters mentioned for 
> initial tuning.  The complete file can stay as a sample.  Any objections to 
> that?  (Let's not discuss quite yet exactly which parameters are the chosen 
> ones.)
>
>   

i think this would make sense as long as this small file tells users 
where to find the "full story".
generally i would say that this would be a step into the right direction.

alternatively we could use some sort of "#include" mechanism to split 
"most important" and "not so important".
   hans


-- 
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
PostgreSQL Solutions and Support
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql-support.de, www.postgresql-support.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures