Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint
Date
Msg-id 48A03587.5030709@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: Proposal: PageLayout footprint  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Similar is 32/64 bit compilation. It is handled on x86 by MAXALIGN but 
> MAXALIGN is same on SPARC for both binaries, but I'm not sure if it 
> works correctly.

Are 32/64-bit binaries on Sparc incompatible, then? Does our control 
file check catch it? If not, what's causing it, and would the 
--footprint switch catch it?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Skimming icc warnings on mongoose
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: UTF8 to_ascii function