Re: Unexpectedly Long DELETE Wait - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Unexpectedly Long DELETE Wait
Date
Msg-id 489AAB08.9080409@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Unexpectedly Long DELETE Wait  (Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unexpectedly Long DELETE Wait
List pgsql-performance
Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below command has been running since ~700 minutes in one of our
> PostgreSQL servers.
>
>   DELETE FROM mugpsreglog
>         WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
>                             FROM mueventlog
>                            WHERE mueventlog.eventlogid = mugpsreglog.eventlogid);
>
>    Seq Scan on mugpsreglog  (cost=0.00..57184031821394.73 rows=6590986 width=6)
>      Filter: (NOT (subplan))
>         SubPlan
>              ->  Seq Scan on mueventlog  (cost=0.00..4338048.00 rows=1 width=0)
>              Filter: (eventlogid = $0)

Ouch - look at the estimated cost on that!

> And there isn't any constraints (FK/PK), triggers, indexes, etc. on any
> of the tables. (We're in the phase of a migration, many DELETE commands
> similar to above gets executed to relax constraints will be introduced.)

Well there you go. Add an index on eventlogid for mugpsreglog.

Alternatively, if you increased your work_mem that might help. Try SET
work_mem='64MB' (or even higher) before running the explain and see if
it tries a materialize. For situations like this where you're doing big
one-off queries you can afford to increase resource limits.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Giorgio Valoti
Date:
Subject: Query Plan choice with timestamps
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Plz Heeeelp! performance settings