Re: Less rows -> better performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Less rows -> better performance?
Date
Msg-id 488494F4.5070401@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Less rows -> better performance?  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org> wrote:
>> SELECT pg_database.datname,
>> pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size(pg_database.datname)) AS size
>> FROM pg_database where pg_database.datname = 'vvz_live_1';
>>
>>    datname    |  size
>> ---------------+---------
>>  vvz_live_1    | 2565 MB
>>
>> I wonder why the actual size is so much bigger than the data-only dump - is
>> this because of index data etc.?
>
> More probably because the database is totally bloated. Do you run
> VACUUM regularly or did you set up autovacuum?

You might also want to REINDEX and see if that improves things. My
understanding is that if vacuum isn't run regularly, the indexes may end
up a bit of a mess as well as the tables.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
Next
From: Rusty Conover
Date:
Subject: Re: Perl/DBI vs Native