Re: automatically generating node support functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date
Msg-id 487a96ce-9a5e-d89c-b1e7-c3a8285d8b15@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automatically generating node support functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 25.03.22 14:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On 24.03.22 22:57, David Rowley wrote:
>>> Also, I'm quite keen to see this work make it into v15.  Do you think
>>> you'll get time to do that? Thanks for working on it.
> 
>> My thinking right now is to wait for the PG16 branch to open and then
>> consider putting it in early.
> 
> +1.  However, as noted by David (and I think I made similar points awhile
> ago), the patch could still use a lot of mop-up work.  It'd be prudent to
> continue working on it so it will actually be ready to go when the branch
> is made.

The v5 patch was intended to address all the comments you made in your 
Feb. 14 mail.  I'm not aware of any open issues from that.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Use JOIN USING aliases in ruleutils.c
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table