Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:23 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Especially if it returned an updated row count or supported the
>> RETURNING clause, so you could find out after the fact what was or
>> wasn't done.
>
> Well, it is supposed to be used as "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED",
> so you can in fact put the locked row ids in the target list. With a
> "LIMIT 1" appended would be the perfect way to check out the next queue
> item to process...
That makes sense. I was thinking of UPDATE ... SKIP LOCKED RETURNING
instead, which could be handy in similar situations.
--
Craig Ringer
