Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>> 26 окт. 2021 г., в 22:41, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> написал(а):
>> We can get around that though, by using pg_try_advisory_lock and not
>> proceeding if it fails. The attached POC does this for the 002 test;
>> it looks like the same thing could be done to 003.
> That's a neat idea. PFA patch with copy of this changes to 003.
Pushed. It'll be interesting to see if conchuela's behavior changes.
regards, tom lane