I will try to look at it again in a few days.
cheers
andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What is our plan for pgindent for 8.4? I would rather not have to bug
> someone to create a list of symbols manually. I would like it to be
> built on a regular basis and I can pull it from there and add it to CVS
> when I run pgindent.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>
>>> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
>>>>> wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
>>> we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
>>> much.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
>>>> build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
>>> are a basically the same order of magnitude.
>>>
>>>
>> It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
>> water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
>> working on getting a similar list from MinGW.
>>
>> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=brown_bat&dt=2008-04-18%20230054&stg=typedefs
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> andrew
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>
>
>
