Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Reflecting on this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-06/msg00344.php
> it strikes me that the elog messages in tuptoaster.c would be
> significantly more useful if they gave the name of the toast table
> containing the problem, which is readily available at the sites of
> the elog calls. Any objections? Should I back-patch that, or
> just do it in HEAD?
+1 for back patching as well.
Zdenek
