Re: Automating our version-stamping a bit better - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Automating our version-stamping a bit better
Date
Msg-id 484C854C.8050403@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Automating our version-stamping a bit better  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Automating our version-stamping a bit better  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Automating our version-stamping a bit better  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'm tempted to suggest letting the script invoke autoconf, too,
> but that would require standardizing where to find the correct
> version of autoconf for each branch; so it might not be such a
> great idea.    
>
>   

Unfortunately that's true. Maybe we could agree on using an alias for 
the right version of autoconf, but it seems likely to be error prone.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Automating our version-stamping a bit better
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Automating our version-stamping a bit better