Re: New DTrace probes proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Lor
Subject Re: New DTrace probes proposal
Date
Msg-id 4849B31B.8070004@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New DTrace probes proposal  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote:
>
> While it would be nice to have a clean merge of the two, it's probably simple enough to just 
> re-implement the differences into your patch (since yours already compiles on 8.4).
Should be straightforward ... I can do the merge.
>   As far as naming scheme, I'm not particularly wedded to either... is 
> there a dtrace naming convention that could be followed? 
>   
Yep, and the probes I submitted  pretty much follow the suggested naming 
convention.

-Robert



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: log_filename()
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS