Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Devrim Gündüz
Subject Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming
Date
Msg-id 48482592-9247-4850-B575-B4BAB84C4F44@gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming  (Daniel Farina <daniel@citusdata.com>)
Responses Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming  (Daniel Farina <daniel@citusdata.com>)
List pgsql-pkg-yum
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the feedback! Can you please update the packages? I pushed a fix for this last week. Regards, Devrim On 27 November 2017 22:04:58 GMT+00:00, Daniel Farina wrote: >On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:59 AM Devrim Gündüz >wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am about to push PostGIS 2.4.2-2 packages to 10-testing repos. >Unlike the >> other packages, the new packages will depend on proj49 (Proj 4.9) and >> geos36 >> (GeOS 3.6) packages, which installs to non-standard directories >> (/usr/proj49 >> and /usr/geos36, respectively), so won't conflict with the OS >packages, but >> will use recent versions of Proj and GeOS. With this change, we can >> introduce >> GeOS 3.7 support to our repo, when it is released. >> >> I read some reports about proj 4.8 reporting incorrect results, that >> triggered >> this package process. >> >> So, I will be happy if someone can test by enabling PG 10 testing >> repository, >> and see if things are broken or not. >> >> >I think postgis is not dynamically linking properly to proj. It finds >the >path fine when compiling, though. Perhaps it, like libproj49 itself in >relation to geos36, requires some ldconfig files. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming