Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Shane Ambler
Subject Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Date
Msg-id 483EE9CD.3080409@Sheeky.Biz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>)
Responses Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules  ("Jonathan Bond-Caron" <jbondc@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Justin wrote:

> I'm proposing a CYA that could be used to protect all open source
> projects not just postgresql.  Instead of complaining about how wrong
> the system is and the need to change it is.  Use the system to
> protect the project.
>

Exactly. The real problem is that the first one to apply for a patent
gets it. It really doesn't matter who invents it. If we have patents
that cover our work then we can control who uses it and for what
purpose, also preventing others from patenting our ideas and stopping us
from using them.


Whether we handle our own patents or contribute them to another groups
collection of patents is up for debate.

Two groups heading this way that I know of -

http://www.patentcommons.org
(MS and Oracle are listed as contributors here)

http://www.openinventionnetwork.com

These seem a little similar to each other to me - the
supporters/members are basically the same with different contributors.

I am sure there was another but I can't seem to recall what it was.



--

Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Gavin M. Roy"
Date:
Subject: DRDB for Standby, Failover
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules