Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
Date
Msg-id 4827.1560733813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Jun-16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you're going to push anything before tomorrow's wrap, please do it
>> *now* not later.  We're running out of time to get a full sample of
>> buildfarm results.

> Yeah, I had to bail out earlier today, so the only thing I'm confident
> pushing now is a revert.

Yeah, let's do that.  I don't want to risk shipping broken code.
We can try again for the next updates.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: nbtdesc.c and nbtpage.c are inconsistent withXLOG_BTREE_META_CLEANUP (11~)