Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> Well it should be optional but it would be nice if we had the option
>>> to have it renamed per the default... meaning the same output if I
>>> were to do this:
>>
>> If you want that, you can rename the index (either before or afterwards).
>> I don't see any reason to clutter the make-constraint-from-index command
>> with questions of renaming.
>
> As a counter point, I don't see any reason to make the DBA's life
> harder. Sure it is just one step but it is a human step, prone to error
> and taking more time than it should. Why not just make it easy?
> Especially when the easy isn't sacrificing data integrity or quality of
> product?
well the name is by no means a functional problem. Its merely cosmetics,
so if you want propose that a warning is issued to suggest a saner name.
This should be sufficient I think.
T.
