Re: we don't have a bugzilla - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: we don't have a bugzilla
Date
Msg-id 481347A7.9000600@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: we don't have a bugzilla  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: we don't have a bugzilla  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Brendan Jurd wrote:

>>  Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution to the
>> discussion.
>>
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Let's be fair.  It would be an almost impossible task to make any
> sense of the archives on this topic without dedicating tens of hours
> to the task, and having access to a better way of reading the archives
> than is offered at archives.postgresql.org.

+1

The idea that anyone would waste their time (and yes it is a complete 
waste of time) reviewing the "archives" which are almost impossible to 
search unless you know "exactly" what you are looking for is ridiculous.
Andrew, I am frankly surprised that you would have that response for the 
individual.

How do you know he was trolling? Perhaps he is just surprised (which is 
the impression that I got) that considering we are such a mature project 
that we don't have a bugzilla or other such beast.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM fill ratio
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing