Re: query performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brian Cox
Subject Re: query performance
Date
Msg-id 481128B6.7050609@ca.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to query performance  (Brian Cox <brian.cox@ca.com>)
Responses Re: query performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane [tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] wrote:

> At the very end ... you're looking for these messages:
>
>     ereport(elevel,
>             (errmsg("free space map contains %d pages in %d relations",
>                     storedPages, numRels),
>     errdetail("A total of %.0f page slots are in use (including
> overhead).\n"
>               "%.0f page slots are required to track all free space.\n"
>           "Current limits are:  %d page slots, %d relations, using %.0f
> kB.",
>               Min(needed, MaxFSMPages),
>               needed,
>               MaxFSMPages, MaxFSMRelations,
>               (double) FreeSpaceShmemSize() / 1024.0)));
>
>     if (numRels == MaxFSMRelations)
>         ereport(elevel,
>                 (errmsg("max_fsm_relations(%d) equals the number of
> relations checked",
>                         MaxFSMRelations),
>                  errhint("You have at least %d relations.  "
>                          "Consider increasing the configuration
> parameter \"max_fsm_relations\".",
>                          numRels)));
>     else if (needed > MaxFSMPages)
>         ereport(elevel,
>                 (errmsg("number of page slots needed (%.0f) exceeds
> max_fsm_pages (%d)",
>                         needed, MaxFSMPages),
>                  errhint("Consider increasing the configuration
> parameter \"max_fsm_pages\" "
>                          "to a value over %.0f.", needed)));
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

The following greps of the vacuum verbose output return no lines:

fgrep -i fsm
fgrep 'free space'
fgrep 'page slots'
fgrep 'relations'

I've already posted the tail of this output previously.
I conclude that these lines are not in this file. Where
did they go?

Thanks,
Brian

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: query performance
Next
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Confused by result of pg_catalog.format_type()