Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
>>> wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
>>>
>
> Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
> we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
> much.
>
>
>> 2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
>> build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
>>
>
> The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
> are a basically the same order of magnitude.
>
It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
working on getting a similar list from MinGW.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=brown_bat&dt=2008-04-18%20230054&stg=typedefs
cheers
andrew
