Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:54:52 -0400
> Geoffrey <lists@serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> What about the:
>>
>> 8.1 -> slony -> 8.3
>> switch users to 8.3 databases
>>
>> solution.
>
> Is it? What is your transactional velocity? How long will the initial
> sync transaction have to run? You know vacuum isn't working while
> that transaction is open right? Are you going to have to setup up a
> dozen different replicated sets in order to get it done?
>
> Slony works in "some" cases it does not work in all nor the most
> critical (in terms of large sets with minimal downtime requirement).
I don't know that slony is the answer. It was more of a question then
an answer. We are hoping to use that solution to migrate from 7.4.19 to
8.3.1. The primary reason is to reduce downtime.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
