Re: Index AM change proposals, redux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
Date
Msg-id 47FF8EBC.30308@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index AM change proposals, redux  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Index AM change proposals, redux  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to initialize needRecheck to the opclass
> RECHECK flag value?  If the consistent function does nothing, the
> behavior is the same as before, but it can flip the flag in either
> direction if it wants.

I remember that last spring, in the context of GIT, you were worried 
about the performance implication of preparing to recheck rows when no 
rechecks are needed. I didn't quite buy that back then, but this would 
have the same issue.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index AM change proposals, redux